Single-Blank Text Completion▾
before options
despite · because
before options
eliminate others
Text Completion questions present a sentence with one blank. You select the word that best completes the meaning. There is exactly one correct answer. The correct answer is always fully supported by logic within the sentence — never by outside knowledge.
| Step 1 — Read the whole sentence | Understand the full meaning before looking at options. | Never read options first — the sentence tells you what it needs. |
| Step 2 — Find the key signal | Every blank has a clue that tells you its direction. | 'Despite his reputation for generosity, he was ___' → Despite = contrast → opposite of generous. |
| Step 3 — Predict your own word | Before looking at options, form a rough prediction. | 'Nobody believed it' → predict: doubted, rejected, dismissed. |
| Step 4 — Match and eliminate | Find the closest option to your prediction. | Never choose a word just because it sounds sophisticated. |
| Same direction | and · also · moreover · indeed · even · in fact | Blank continues or intensifies the existing idea. |
| Opposite direction | but · however · although · despite · yet · while · ironically · paradoxically | Blank contrasts with or reverses the existing idea. |
| Cause → effect | because · since · therefore · thus · consequently | Blank is the cause or result of what is stated. |
| Restatement | in other words · namely · that is · specifically · colon ( : ) | Blank restates the idea — same direction, often stronger. |
| Topic trap | A word that fits the topic but not the sentence logic. | 'The lecture was ___' — 'informative' seems right but if the signal says boring, it's wrong. |
| Partial fit | Fits one part of the sentence but contradicts another. | Always check the word against the ENTIRE sentence. |
| Degree trap | Two options share a direction but differ in intensity. | 'sceptical' vs 'dismissive' — use the signal to determine degree. |
Two-Blank Text Completion▾
Two-blank questions have two blanks, each with 5 answer choices. You choose one word per blank. Both must be correct — there is no partial credit. The two blanks are logically related and must work together to produce a coherent sentence.
| Step 1 — Find the easier blank | One blank usually has stronger clues. Start there. | Work easiest to hardest, not left to right. |
| Step 2 — Establish the relationship | Are the blanks same direction, contrast, or cause-effect? | 'His ___ manner concealed a ___ intelligence' → same direction, both suggest hidden depth. |
| Step 3 — Predict both words | Predict a rough word for each blank before reading options. | Prevents anchoring to wrong options. |
| Step 4 — Test together | Read the full sentence with both words inserted. | A word that works for one blank but breaks the logic of the other is wrong. |
| Contrast | The two blanks contrast each other or contrast with surrounding text. | 'Although he was ___, his work was ___' → if lazy, work surprisingly good. |
| Parallel | Both blanks reinforce or mirror each other. | 'Her ___ manner and ___ speech put everyone at ease' → both warm/calm. |
| Cause-effect | One blank causes or results from the other. | 'His ___ preparation led to a ___ performance' → thorough → excellent. |
| Eliminate by direction | Wrong-direction words eliminated immediately — before vocabulary matters. | If blank needs positive word, eliminate all negative options at once. |
| Anchor from easier blank | Confirmed blank constrains the other. | Blank 1 positive + contrast relationship → Blank 2 must be negative. |
| No split pairs | If your Blank 1 choice breaks Blank 2, Blank 1 is wrong. | Go back and reconsider rather than forcing a fit. |
Three-Blank Text Completion▾
Three-blank questions have three blanks, each with 5 options. All three must be correct — no partial credit. The passage is longer (2-4 sentences) and the blanks are spread across it. This tests your ability to track logical relationships across multiple clauses.
| Read the whole passage first | Understand the overall argument before attempting any blank. | The passage has one coherent point — identify it first. |
| Find each blank's role | Is each blank the main idea, a contrast, an example, or a consequence? | Blanks are logically connected — treat the passage as one unit. |
| Start with the most constrained blank | The blank with the clearest clue is your anchor. | One confirmed blank constrains the others. |
| Verify all three together | Read the complete passage with all three words inserted. | Grammatically correct but logically inconsistent = wrong. |
| Topic + elaboration | First blank = main point. Other blanks = elaboration or contrast. | Identify the topic sentence before anything else. |
| Contrast structure | 'Although X, Y; indeed Z' — blanks track the contrast across sentences. | Keep track of which side of the contrast each blank falls on. |
| Cause-effect chain | Blank 1 causes Blank 2, which results in Blank 3. | Follow the chain — don't let a sophisticated word derail you. |
| Two right, one wrong | Most common error — two blanks seem right but the third is subtly off. | Always verify all three before finalising. |
| Ignoring passage logic | Choosing each blank in isolation without tracking the overall direction. | The passage is a single argument — treat it as one. |
| Vocabulary dependence | Three-blank questions often require less common words. | Build vocabulary — Groups 1-3 in this tool cover the most tested GRE words. |
Text Completion Strategy▾
in fact · even · also
Blank continues or intensifies
yet · however · ironically
Blank contrasts or reverses
“She was frugal: she ___” blank = synonym of frugal
“Indeed, he was ___” blank = stronger than prior word
| Never read options first | Options anchor you to wrong answers. Always predict before looking. | Cover the options with your hand if necessary. |
| Predict direction, not just word | Even 'something positive' eliminates 2-3 options before vocabulary matters. | Logic first, vocabulary second. |
| Follow the logic, not the topic | The correct answer follows from sentence logic, not subject knowledge. | A TC about physics is answered using grammar and logic, not physics. |
| Transition words are your map | Mark every major transition before reading options. | Circle: but, although, despite, however, because, therefore, indeed, ironically. |
| Colon (:) and semicolon (;) | Signal restatement or elaboration — blank = same direction, often stronger. | 'She was frugal: she ___' → blank = something synonymous with frugal. |
| 'Indeed' and 'in fact' | Intensify — blank is a stronger version of what just came before. | 'He was angry; indeed, he was ___' → blank = more extreme than angry. |
| 'Irony' and 'paradox' | Signal opposite of expectation. | 'Paradoxically, the medicine ___' → blank = opposite of expected effect. |
| Negative + negative = positive | Double negation creates positive meaning. | 'She was not ___ to help' → reluctant → she was actually willing. |
| Root recognition | Break unknown words into roots to determine meaning. | 'Magnanimous' = magn (great) + animus (spirit) = generous. |
| Tone detection | Positive/negative/neutral determination works even without knowing a word. | 'Vituperative' sounds harsh → negative → use if blank needs negative word. |
| Eliminate by register | GRE answers are formal. Colloquial options are usually wrong. | 'good', 'nice', 'bad' are eliminated in favour of 'salutary', 'affable', 'pernicious'. |
Sentence Equivalence — How It Works▾
obscurity + opacity = near-synonyms = correct pair ✓
Sentence Equivalence questions present one sentence with one blank and SIX answer choices. You must select EXACTLY TWO answers that:
1. Each individually produce a complete and coherent sentence
2. Produce sentences that are equivalent in meaning to each other
No partial credit — you must get both correct answers.
| Six options, not five | SE has 6 options; single-blank TC has 5. | More options = more potential traps. |
| Two correct answers | TC has one correct; SE requires exactly two. | Both must work grammatically AND semantically. |
| Equivalence requirement | The two sentences produced must mean essentially the same thing. | Two words that fit but mean opposites = wrong. |
| One blank only | SE always has exactly one blank. | Simpler structure than 2- or 3-blank TC, but higher vocabulary demand. |
| Step 1 — Predict as usual | Read the sentence, find the signal, predict a word. | Identical to single-blank TC method. |
| Step 2 — Find a synonym pair | In the 6 options, look for two words close in meaning. | GRE SE correct answers are almost always near-synonyms. |
| Step 3 — Verify both work | Insert each word and check grammatically and logically. | A word that fits but creates different meaning = wrong. |
| Step 4 — Confirm equivalence | Read both completed sentences. Do they mean the same thing? | If they mean different things, at least one choice is wrong. |
GRE SE correct answers are almost always a pair of near-synonyms.
✓ Find the two closest synonyms in the six options — even before predicting — and verify both fit.
✓ If you see a clear synonym pair that both fit the blank, they are almost certainly the answer.
✗ Watch for the 'trap pair': two words that seem synonymous but differ in a nuance that matters for the sentence. Always verify both individually against the sentence.
| Near-synonym trap | Two words are close in meaning but one contradicts the sentence logic. | 'frugal' and 'thrifty' are synonyms — but context may demand the stronger 'miserly'. |
| Single-fit trap | One word fits perfectly but its near-synonym does not quite work. | Check both words independently, not just as a pair. |
| Attractive distractor | A word fits the sentence but has no near-synonym among the other 5 options. | A word without a partner cannot be the answer — eliminate it. |
Sentence Equivalence Strategy▾
| Step 1 — Read and predict | Read the full sentence. Find the signal word. Predict a word. | Same first step as all TC questions. |
| Step 2 — Scan for synonym pairs | Before matching to your prediction, scan the 6 options for near-synonym pairs. | GRE SE answers are almost always synonyms. Identify candidates fast. |
| Step 3 — Match pairs to prediction | Of the synonym pairs you found, which pair is closest to your predicted word? | Two pairs might both seem right — your prediction resolves the tie. |
| Step 4 — Verify both individually | Insert each word into the sentence and verify it is grammatically and logically correct. | Never assume — always check both words separately. |
| Step 5 — Confirm equivalence | Read both completed sentences. Do they mean essentially the same thing? | Different meanings = wrong pair. Equivalent meanings = correct pair. |
Step 2 is the critical time-saver. Before spending time on vocabulary, scan all 6 options and group them by meaning:
Group A: words that seem positive
Group B: words that seem negative
Group C: words that seem neutral
The correct pair will almost always be in the same group. If your signal word points to a negative blank, the correct pair will be in Group B. This narrows 6 options to 2-3 before you evaluate a single word carefully.
| Root analysis | Break the word into Latin/Greek roots to approximate meaning. | 'bene-' = good; 'mal-' = bad; 'pro-' = for; 'contra-' = against |
| Sound and register | Harsh, hard sounds often signal negative words; soft sounds often positive. | 'vituperative', 'acrimonious', 'caustic' — all sound harsh = all negative |
| Elimination by partner | If a word has no plausible synonym among the other 5, it cannot be correct. | Eliminate it regardless of how well it fits the blank. |
| Never eliminate the unfamiliar | An unfamiliar word may be exactly the right high-frequency GRE word. | Unknown ≠ wrong. Eliminate only what you can disprove. |
| Target time | 90 seconds maximum per SE question. | SE questions look simple but vocabulary demand is high. |
| If stuck | Use the synonym scan to identify the most likely pair, then guess from it. | A structured guess is better than a random one. |
| Skip and return | If no synonym pair is visible, mark and move on — return with fresh eyes. | One difficult SE question should not consume time needed for others. |
Synonym Recognition▾
obdurate
recalcitrant
pertinacious
imperturbable
unruffled
composed
verbose
garrulous
loquacious
terse
pithy
succinct
deleterious
noxious
injurious
SE questions require you to identify synonym pairs. TC questions require you to select the word closest to your prediction. In both cases, the skill is the same: recognising when two words share enough meaning to be equivalent in a given context.
Synonyms are rarely perfect. Two words that are synonyms in one context may not be synonyms in another. 'Slim' and 'slender' are synonyms when describing a person, but only 'slim' works in 'a slim chance'. Context determines which synonym pairs work.
| Praise / approve | laud · extol · commend · applaud · acclaim · eulogise · lionise | All mean to praise highly. |
| Criticise / attack | censure · denounce · condemn · castigate · excoriate · lambaste · vilify | All mean to criticise harshly. |
| Calm / peaceful | placid · serene · tranquil · equanimous · imperturbable · unruffled | All describe calmness under pressure. |
| Honest / open | candid · forthright · transparent · guileless · ingenuous · frank | All mean honest and open. |
| Stubborn / unyielding | intransigent · obdurate · recalcitrant · refractory · obstinate · pertinacious | All mean stubbornly refusing to change. |
| Wordy / verbose | prolix · loquacious · garrulous · long-winded · verbose · discursive | All mean using too many words. |
| Brief / concise | terse · laconic · succinct · pithy · concise · economical | All mean using few words. |
| Weak / ineffective | ineffectual · feckless · impotent · nugatory · unavailing | All mean producing no result. |
| Praise-worthy / exemplary | laudable · commendable · meritorious · praiseworthy · exemplary | All describe something deserving of praise. |
| Harmful / damaging | pernicious · deleterious · detrimental · noxious · injurious · baneful | All mean causing harm. |
| bene / bon | good, well | beneficial · benevolent · benign · bonhomie |
| mal / mis | bad, wrongly | malevolent · malign · malicious · misanthrope |
| pro | forward, in favour of | prolific · proponent · propitious |
| contra / anti | against | contradict · antipathy · antithetical |
| loqui / loqu | speak | loquacious · eloquent · colloquy · soliloquy |
| greg | group, flock | gregarious · egregious · congregation · segregate |
| cred | believe | credulous · incredulous · credible · discredit |
RC — Main Idea & Primary Purpose▾
“The policy has failed to address inequality despite its stated goals.”
Covers only one detail
Extends beyond the passage
| Main Idea | Asks what the passage is primarily about. Tests your understanding of the central argument. | 'The primary subject of the passage is...' / 'The passage is primarily concerned with...' |
| Primary Purpose | Asks why the author wrote the passage — the author's goal or intention. | 'The author's primary purpose is...' / 'The passage serves primarily to...' |
| Read the first sentence carefully | The first sentence of a GRE passage usually introduces the topic or main claim. | But the first sentence is not always the main idea — it may just set context. |
| Track the argument | What claim does the author make? What evidence supports it? | The main idea = the author's central claim, not just the topic. |
| The last sentence test | The final sentence often restates or sharpens the main idea. | 'Thus...' / 'In sum...' / 'Ultimately...' — the final sentence usually confirms the main idea. |
| Too broad or too narrow? | Wrong answers are either too broad (covers more than the passage) or too narrow (covers only one part). | A correct main idea covers the ENTIRE passage — not just the first paragraph. |
| Argue / contend | The author is making a case for a position. | 'to argue that...' / 'to contend that...' / 'to assert...' |
| Describe / explain | The author is informing the reader about a topic. | 'to describe...' / 'to explain...' / 'to examine...' |
| Challenge / critique | The author is disputing an existing view. | 'to challenge the view that...' / 'to question...' / 'to refute...' |
| Reconcile / compare | The author is examining two positions. | 'to compare X and Y...' / 'to reconcile...' / 'to contrast...' |
| Illustrate | The author uses examples to demonstrate a point. | 'to illustrate...' / 'to demonstrate through examples...' |
| Too specific | Covers only a detail or example from the passage, not the main argument. | A passage about the causes of the French Revolution — answer about Robespierre alone = too specific. |
| Too broad | Extends beyond what the passage discusses. | A passage about one novel — answer about 'all Victorian literature' = too broad. |
| Contradicts tone | Gets the author's position backwards — says the author supports what the author actually criticises. | Read for tone: does the author approve, question, or remain neutral? |
| Outside the passage | Introduces information or ideas not present in the passage. | Wrong answers often include plausible-sounding information the passage never mentions. |
RC — Detail & Inference Questions▾
Locate the exact section.
Paraphrase what it says.
Ask: MUST this be true?
Avoid absolute claims.
| Detail questions | Ask about information explicitly stated in the passage. | 'According to the passage...' / 'The passage states that...' / 'The author mentions that...' |
| Inference questions | Ask about what can be logically concluded from the passage — not what is stated, but what must be true. | 'It can be inferred from the passage that...' / 'The passage suggests...' / 'The author implies...' |
| Locate before answering | For detail questions, find the relevant section of the passage before reading options. | Never answer a detail question from memory — always locate the text. |
| Match exactly | The correct answer paraphrases what the passage says, not extends it. | Correct answers do not add information not in the passage. |
| Distractor patterns | Wrong answers often use words from the passage in a different context, or change a key detail slightly. | 'The passage says X causes Y' — wrong answer: 'Y causes X'. |
| Inferences must be supported | A valid inference is supported by evidence in the passage — it is not a guess. | The correct answer must be true given what the passage says. |
| Strongest claim the evidence supports | The correct inference is often the most conservative claim the passage fully supports. | Avoid dramatic leaps — inferences on GRE are usually modest and carefully worded. |
| 'Must be true' vs 'could be true' | GRE inference questions require answers that MUST be true based on the passage. | 'Could be true' is not sufficient — the passage must logically require the inference. |
| Too strong | The answer makes a claim stronger than the passage supports. | 'always', 'never', 'all', 'none' — the passage rarely justifies these absolute claims. |
| Right idea, wrong direction | Reverses a cause-effect or comparison from the passage. | 'X is more effective than Y' → wrong answer: 'Y is more effective than X'. |
| Partial | True of only part of the passage, or only one example. | A statement that applies to one case but is presented as a general rule. |
| Plausible but unsupported | Sounds reasonable but the passage never provides evidence for it. | The most dangerous wrong answer type — eliminate by asking 'where in the passage is this supported?' |
RC — Strengthen, Weaken & Evaluate▾
Eliminate alternative causes
Add confirming evidence
Introduce alternative cause
Undermine the evidence
Answer: information about the key assumption — use the “it depends on whether” test
Some GRE RC passages present arguments — a claim supported by evidence. Three related question types test your ability to evaluate these arguments:
Strengthen: Find new information that makes the argument more convincing.
Weaken: Find new information that makes the argument less convincing.
Evaluate: Identify what additional information would most help in assessing the argument.
| Conclusion | The main claim the argument is trying to establish. | 'Therefore, X causes Y.' / 'Thus, the policy should be adopted.' |
| Premises | The evidence or reasons given to support the conclusion. | 'Studies show...' / 'Historical data indicates...' / 'In all tested cases...' |
| Assumption | An unstated premise the argument depends on being true. | If the argument says 'A therefore C', the assumption is often 'A leads to B, B leads to C'. |
| Support the assumption | The strongest strengtheners support the argument's unstated assumption. | If the argument assumes X = Y, evidence that X = Y strengthens it. |
| Eliminate alternative explanations | If the conclusion could be explained by something else, ruling out that explanation strengthens the argument. | 'X causes Y' is strengthened by showing other potential causes of Y are absent. |
| Add confirming evidence | New evidence that directly supports the conclusion. | Additional data showing the same correlation or effect. |
| Attack the assumption | The strongest weakeners attack the argument's unstated assumption. | If the argument assumes X = Y, evidence that X ≠ Y weakens it. |
| Introduce alternative explanation | If there is another explanation for the evidence, the conclusion is less certain. | 'X causes Y' is weakened by showing Z (not X) could cause Y. |
| Undermine the evidence | Show the evidence is flawed, unrepresentative, or irrelevant. | If the study has a small sample or a biased methodology, its conclusions are weaker. |
| Identify the key uncertainty | Evaluate questions ask what information would most help in assessing the argument. | Find the argument's central assumption or gap — information about that gap is most helpful. |
| The 'it depends' test | Ask: what would determine whether the conclusion is true or false? | The most useful information to evaluate an argument is information about its key assumption. |
RC Strategy & Passage Mapping▾
importantly · successfully
Positive evaluative language
unfortunately · problematic
Negative evaluative language
For every specific question — go back to the passage. Never answer from memory.
| Argument passage | Author takes a clear position and argues for it. Look for claim + evidence structure. | 100-200 words. Common in single-paragraph passages. |
| Informational passage | Author explains or describes without strong personal stance. Tone is neutral. | 200-400 words. Multi-paragraph. |
| Analytical passage | Author examines multiple views, often comparing or critiquing positions. | 300-450 words. Tests ability to track whose view is whose. |
| Read actively, not passively | Ask: What is the author's point? Who is being discussed? What is the tone? | Don't just absorb — annotate mentally. |
| First sentence = topic or claim | The opening sentence usually signals what the passage is about. | Mark it as Topic or Claim. |
| Track each paragraph's function | What does this paragraph DO? Introduce / Support / Contrast / Conclude? | One word per paragraph: 'intro / evidence / contrast / conclusion' |
| Mark tone shifts | 'However' · 'But' · 'Yet' = shift in direction. Mark these immediately. | Tone shifts are where detail and inference questions come from. |
| Identify the conclusion | Where does the author land? Last sentence? End of a paragraph? | The conclusion is the most important sentence in any argument passage. |
| Single paragraph (100-150 words) | Read fully. 1-2 minutes total for passage + questions. | Do not skim short passages — every word matters. |
| Two paragraphs (150-300 words) | Read actively, map each paragraph's function. 2-3 minutes. | Questions usually span both paragraphs. |
| Long passage (300-450 words) | Read intro + conclusion of each paragraph. Map structure. 3-4 minutes. | Return to relevant sections for specific questions. |
For every question except main idea and primary purpose, RETURN to the passage before answering. Find the relevant section. Read 2-3 sentences around it. Then answer.
Never answer RC questions from memory. The GRE designs wrong answers to match what test-takers remember — not what the passage actually says.
Vocabulary Group 1 — Tone & Attitude▾
GRE passages and TC/SE questions constantly test words that describe attitude, tone, or manner. Knowing whether a word is positive, negative, or neutral — and its precise degree — is essential for both vocabulary questions and RC questions about author attitude.
| sanguine | optimistic, especially in a difficult situation | She remained sanguine despite the setbacks. |
| sanguine | optimistic, especially in a difficult situation | She remained sanguine despite the setbacks. |
| affable | friendly and easy to talk to | His affable manner put guests immediately at ease. |
| ebullient | cheerful and full of energy | The ebullient crowd celebrated the victory. |
| magnanimous | generous in forgiving, not petty | The magnanimous victor congratulated her opponent. |
| benevolent | well-meaning, kindly | The benevolent patron funded many charitable projects. |
| cordial | warm and friendly | Despite their differences, they maintained a cordial relationship. |
| sanguine | optimistic, especially in a difficult situation | She remained sanguine despite the setbacks. |
| censorious | severely critical of others | The censorious reviewer gave no film a positive review. |
| sardonic | grimly mocking or cynical | His sardonic comments masked deep disappointment. |
| acerbic | sharp and forthright; bitter in tone | Her acerbic wit could wound as well as entertain. |
| caustic | severely critical; burning | The caustic editorial left the minister red-faced. |
| querulous | complaining in a petulant way | The querulous passenger demanded a refund. |
| vituperative | bitter and abusive | The debate descended into vituperative personal attacks. |
| contemptuous | showing disrespect; scornful | She was contemptuous of his excuses. |
| disdainful | feeling that something is beneath you | His disdainful expression said everything. |
| circumspect | wary and unwilling to take risks | A circumspect investor avoids speculation. |
| dispassionate | not influenced by emotion; objective | A dispassionate analysis of the data revealed no bias. |
| equivocal | open to multiple interpretations; ambiguous | Her equivocal response satisfied no one. |
| ambivalent | having mixed feelings | He was ambivalent about the promotion. |
| reticent | reluctant to speak; reserved | The reticent witness gave only brief answers. |
| diffident | modest or shy due to lack of self-confidence | Despite her abilities, she was diffident in interviews. |
Vocabulary Group 2 — Academic & Formal▾
GRE passages and TC questions are written in formal academic prose. The vocabulary in this group appears both as answer choices and in passage text. These words describe intellectual processes, scholarly arguments, and formal reasoning.
| cogent | clear, logical, and convincing | A cogent argument leaves no room for doubt. |
| tendentious | promoting a particular cause; biased | The tendentious report ignored contradictory evidence. |
| specious | seeming correct but actually wrong | His specious argument convinced many but fooled few experts. |
| sophistry | clever but misleading reasoning | The lawyer's sophistry confused the jury. |
| pellucid | transparently clear; easy to understand | Her pellucid prose made complex ideas accessible. |
| opaque | not transparent; hard to understand | The report's opaque language concealed its real conclusions. |
| abstruse | obscure and difficult to understand | The professor's abstruse lecture lost most of the class. |
| recondite | not known by many; obscure | He had a taste for recondite historical facts. |
| credulous | too willing to believe things | A credulous audience accepted every claim without question. |
| sceptical | inclined to question or doubt | The sceptical reviewer demanded more evidence. |
| dogmatic | asserting opinions as fact; inflexible | A dogmatic thinker resists all new evidence. |
| doctrinaire | applying theories without regard for practicalities | His doctrinaire approach ignored real-world constraints. |
| empirical | based on observation and experiment | Empirical evidence is stronger than theoretical argument. |
| axiomatic | self-evidently true | It is axiomatic that a fair trial requires impartial jurors. |
| veracious | truthful and accurate | A veracious account leaves nothing out. |
| fallacious | based on a mistaken belief; logically unsound | The fallacious reasoning led to a wrong conclusion. |
| mutable | liable to change | Human nature is more mutable than we think. |
| immutable | unchanging over time | The laws of physics are immutable. |
| ephemeral | lasting a very short time | Fame can be ephemeral; legacy is what endures. |
| transient | passing quickly; temporary | A transient economic boom brought short-lived prosperity. |
| inexorable | impossible to stop or prevent | The inexorable advance of technology transforms every industry. |
| inveterate | deeply established by long habit | An inveterate traveller, she had visited 80 countries. |
| nascent | beginning to exist or develop | The nascent technology showed enormous promise. |
| moribund | at the point of death; no longer effective | The moribund industry needed radical reform. |
Vocabulary Group 3 — Describing People▾
GRE passages and questions frequently describe people — scholars, scientists, public figures, historical characters. A wide vocabulary for describing character, behaviour, and intellectual style is essential for both TC/SE questions and for understanding RC passage characterisations.
| perspicacious | having a ready insight into things; shrewd | A perspicacious reader notices subtle inconsistencies. |
| assiduous | showing great care and perseverance | Her assiduous research uncovered overlooked sources. |
| erudite | having wide knowledge; scholarly | The erudite professor drew on literature, science, and philosophy. |
| pedantic | overly concerned with minor details or rules | His pedantic corrections annoyed his collaborators. |
| didactic | intended to teach; sometimes excessively instructive | The novel has a didactic tone that some readers find preachy. |
| prolix | using too many words; long-winded | His prolix emails could have been one-line messages. |
| ingenious | clever, original, and inventive | An ingenious solution solved the problem in seconds. |
| ingenuous | innocent and unsuspecting; naive | Her ingenuous trust in strangers left her vulnerable. |
| venal | showing or motivated by susceptibility to bribery | The venal official accepted payments for favours. |
| mendacious | lying and untruthful | His mendacious account of events deceived no one. |
| obsequious | excessively eager to please or serve | The obsequious assistant agreed with everything the boss said. |
| sycophantic | using excessive flattery to gain advantage | Her sycophantic praise impressed no one. |
| truculent | quick to argue or fight; aggressively defiant | The truculent witness refused to answer directly. |
| pugnacious | eager to argue or fight | A pugnacious debater, she never conceded a point. |
| parsimonious | excessively unwilling to spend money; stingy | His parsimonious nature made him reluctant to tip. |
| profligate | recklessly extravagant or wasteful | His profligate spending left him in debt. |
| pragmatic | dealing with problems in a practical way | A pragmatic solution is better than an ideal one that fails. |
| doctrinaire | applying theories without regard for practicalities | His doctrinaire insistence on the rules frustrated everyone. |
| iconoclast | a person who attacks cherished beliefs or institutions | The iconoclast's paper challenged decades of accepted theory. |
| maverick | a person who thinks independently | The maverick scientist refused to follow conventional methods. |
| dilettante | a person who cultivates a field superficially | A dilettante knows a little about everything and a lot about nothing. |
| polymath | a person with wide knowledge across many fields | Leonardo da Vinci was the archetypal polymath. |
Roots, Prefixes & Suffixes▾
mal = bad
beneficial · malicious
loqu = speak
greg = flock
gregarious · egregious
tenacious → tenacity
loquacious → loquacity
GRE vocabulary is drawn from Latin and Greek roots. If you know 50 key roots, you can make educated guesses about hundreds of words you have never seen. Root knowledge is the most efficient long-term vocabulary strategy.
| bene / bon | good, well | beneficial · benevolent · bonhomie · boon |
| mal / mis | bad, wrongly | malevolent · malign · malicious · misanthrope |
| loqui / loqu / log | speak | loquacious · eloquent · colloquy · monologue |
| greg | flock, group | gregarious · egregious · congregation · segregate |
| cred | believe | credulous · incredulous · credible · discredit |
| ver / verit | truth | veracious · verify · verity · aver |
| phon | sound, voice | cacophony · euphonious · phonetic · symphony |
| path | feeling, suffering | empathy · apathy · antipathy · sympathy · pathos |
| muta | change | mutable · immutable · mutation · transmute |
| voc / vok | call, voice | evoke · provocative · vociferous · advocate |
| flu / flux | flow | fluent · effluent · fluctuate · confluence |
| san | health, mind | sanity · sanguine · insane · sanatorium |
| spect / spec | look, see | perspicacious · spectator · introspection · circumspect |
| ped / pod | foot; child (Latin ped) | pedantic · expedite · pedagogy · impede |
| a / an | without, not | apathy · amoral · anarchy · anomaly |
| bene / eu | good, well | benefactor · euphonious · eulogy · benevolent |
| mal / dys | bad, ill | malevolent · malign · dysfunction · dyslexia |
| pro | forward, in favour of | proponent · prolific · propitious · prodigal |
| contra / anti | against | contradict · antipathy · antithetical · contravene |
| inter | between | interlocutor · interpolate · interlude · intermediary |
| intra / intro | within | introspection · introverted · intramural |
| circum | around | circumspect · circumvent · circumscribe · circumlocution |
| epi | upon, in addition to | epitome · epigraph · epilogue · ephemeral |
| omni | all | omniscient · omnipotent · omnivore · omnibus |
| -ious / -ous | full of, having quality of | tenacious · perspicacious · mendacious · credulous |
| -ity / -ty | state or quality of | tenacity · veracity · sagacity · mendacity |
| -fy / -ify | to make | rectify · mollify · nullify · exemplify |
| -ize / -ise | to make, to become | criticize · satirize · lionize · ostracize |
| -ism | doctrine, system | solipsism · cynicism · empiricism · dogmatism |
| -ist | one who practices | iconoclast → iconoclastic · pragmatist · altruist |
Words Easily Confused▾
GRE deliberately places similar-looking or similar-sounding words in the same question. Knowing the distinction within a pair is more useful than knowing either word alone. These pairs appear in TC, SE, and RC questions.
| ingenious vs ingenuous | Ingenious = clever and inventive. Ingenuous = naive and innocent. | An ingenious solution; an ingenuous child. |
| credulous vs incredulous | Credulous = too willing to believe. Incredulous = unwilling to believe; sceptical. | A credulous audience; an incredulous response. |
| mendacious vs veracious | Mendacious = lying and untruthful. Veracious = truthful and accurate. | A mendacious account; a veracious witness. |
| reticent vs reluctant | Reticent = unwilling to speak. Reluctant = unwilling to act (broader). | Reticent about her plans; reluctant to leave. |
| disinterested vs uninterested | Disinterested = impartial, no personal stake. Uninterested = not interested, bored. | A disinterested judge; an uninterested student. |
| enervate vs energise | Enervate = to weaken or drain of energy. NOT to energise. | The heat enervated the workers. |
| fortuitous vs fortunate | Fortuitous = happening by chance. Fortunate = lucky (positive outcome). | A fortuitous meeting (merely accidental); a fortunate escape (luckily good). |
| precipitate vs precipitous | Precipitate (adj) = done suddenly and rashly. Precipitous = very steep (physical or metaphorical). | A precipitate decision; a precipitous cliff. |
| flaunt vs flout | Flaunt = to display ostentatiously. Flout = to openly disregard a rule. | Flaunt wealth; flout the law. |
| flounder vs founder | Flounder = to struggle and move clumsily. Founder = to fail completely or sink. | The speech floundered; the company foundered. |
| militate vs mitigate | Militate against = to be a powerful factor against. Mitigate = to lessen the severity of. | His past record militated against his appointment. The apology mitigated the damage. |
| affect vs effect | Affect (v) = to influence. Effect (n) = the result. Effect (v, rare) = to bring about. | Stress affects health. The effect was significant. The policy effected change. |
| abjure vs adjure | Abjure = to formally renounce. Adjure = to earnestly urge or request. | He abjured his former beliefs. She adjured him to tell the truth. |
| deprecate vs depreciate | Deprecate = to express disapproval of. Depreciate = to decrease in value. | He deprecated the new policy. The car depreciated quickly. |
| eminent vs imminent | Eminent = famous and respected. Imminent = about to happen very soon. | An eminent scholar; imminent danger. |
Process of Elimination▾
2 options remaining → GUESS — never leave blank on GRE
The GRE is not just a test of what you know — it is a test of what you can eliminate. A student who can confidently eliminate 2 wrong answers and guess from the remaining 2-3 options has a significant advantage over one who needs to identify the correct answer directly. POE is especially powerful when vocabulary is uncertain.
| Eliminate by direction | The blank has a direction (positive/negative/neutral). Eliminate all options in the wrong direction first. | If signal says blank = positive, eliminate all 3 negative options immediately. |
| Eliminate by degree | Even if direction is right, wrong degree eliminates. | 'slightly ___ ' cannot be answered by 'furious' even if both are negative. |
| Eliminate by register | GRE answers are always formal. Colloquial options are usually wrong. | Eliminate 'bad', 'good', 'upset', 'happy' in favour of formal alternatives. |
| Eliminate by grammar | Some options may not fit grammatically. | An adjective slot cannot be filled by a noun — eliminate immediately. |
| Eliminate loners | Any word with no near-synonym among the 6 options cannot be correct. | Even if a word fits perfectly, eliminate it if it has no partner. |
| Eliminate wrong-direction pairs | If both words in a pair move in the wrong direction, eliminate both. | Two negative words when blank needs positive = eliminate both. |
| Eliminate mismatched pairs | Two words that fit individually but don't create equivalent sentences. | 'Smart' and 'clever' may both fit but mean different things in context. |
| Eliminate outside the passage | Any answer that introduces information not in the passage is wrong. | Wrong RC answers often add plausible-sounding facts the passage never states. |
| Eliminate too strong | Any absolute claim ('always', 'never', 'all', 'none') unsupported by the passage. | The passage says 'often' — eliminate any answer that says 'always'. |
| Eliminate wrong direction | An answer that gets the author's position backwards. | Passage praises X — eliminate answers that say the author criticises X. |
| Eliminate partial | True of only one paragraph or one example, not the whole passage. | Applies to main idea questions — the answer must cover the whole passage. |
Step 1: Eliminate confidently wrong answers — anything in the wrong direction, too absolute, outside the passage, or a grammar mismatch.
Step 2: From the remaining options, identify the best fit using positive evidence from the sentence or passage.
If 2 options remain after Step 1 and you are not sure which is correct, guess — a 50/50 guess is far better than skipping.
Tone & Attitude in Passages▾
importantly · notably
successfully · celebrates
overlooks · problematic
laments · questions
Tone and attitude questions ask how the author feels about a subject — not what the author says, but the attitude behind the words. These questions appear in two forms:
1. 'The author's attitude toward X is best described as...'
2. 'The tone of the passage is best described as...'
| Identify evaluative language | Words that express approval or disapproval signal the author's attitude. | 'unfortunately', 'problematic', 'fails to' = negative. 'demonstrates', 'successfully', 'importantly' = positive. |
| Track consistency | The tone should be consistent across the passage. One negative word does not make the whole passage negative. | Look for the dominant tone, not isolated instances. |
| Distinguish author from subject | The author may quote or describe a negative view without sharing it. | 'Critics argue X is flawed' — the author is reporting, not necessarily agreeing. |
| Intensity matters | Tone answers must match the degree of the author's attitude — not just the direction. | 'dismissive' is stronger than 'sceptical'. Choose the right degree. |
| Critical / sceptical | Author questions or challenges a position. | The author is critical of the theory, noting several methodological flaws. |
| Laudatory / admiring | Author praises or approves. | The author lauds the scientist's innovative approach. |
| Neutral / objective | Author describes without personal evaluation. | The author objectively presents both sides of the debate. |
| Ambivalent | Author has mixed feelings. | The author acknowledges both strengths and weaknesses without a clear verdict. |
| Ironic / sardonic | Author uses language that means the opposite of what is literally said. | The author notes 'with some irony' that the policy designed to help has harmed. |
| Cautiously optimistic | Author sees promise but maintains reservations. | The author welcomes the development but notes it is too early to celebrate. |
| Too extreme | 'Scathing', 'contemptuous', 'effusive' when the passage is moderately critical or positive. | Match degree: a mildly critical passage is 'sceptical', not 'contemptuous'. |
| Wrong direction | Gets the author's attitude backwards. | Author praises X — answer says author is 'dismissive' of X. |
| Confuses subject's tone with author's | The author describes an angry debate — but the author's own tone may be calm. | The subject is controversial; the author's tone is analytical. |
| Ignores qualifications | Author says 'somewhat promising' — answer says 'enthusiastically optimistic'. | 'Somewhat' = qualified, hedged. Never infer strong enthusiasm from hedged language. |
Argument Structure▾
because / since / given that therefore / thus / hence
Signals: because, since, given that, for
Negate it → if argument fails, this was it
Signals: therefore, thus, hence
Evaluate = what information most affects whether the assumption is true?
GRE RC passages and strengthen/weaken questions are built on argument structure. Understanding the parts of an argument — conclusion, premises, assumptions — makes you a faster and more accurate reader. You stop asking 'what does this mean?' and start asking 'what is this DOING?'
| Conclusion | The main claim the argument is trying to establish. Often (not always) signalled by: therefore, thus, hence, so, consequently, it follows that. | 'Therefore, the programme should be expanded.' |
| Premises | The evidence or reasons given to support the conclusion. Signalled by: because, since, given that, as, for. | 'Because the data shows improvement in all tested groups...' |
| Assumption | An unstated premise the argument depends on. NOT explicitly stated but REQUIRED for the conclusion to follow. | Argument assumes the improvement was caused by the programme, not other factors. |
| Counter-argument | A view that opposes the main argument. Introduced to be addressed. | 'Critics argue that the cost is prohibitive...' |
| Rebuttal | The author's response to the counter-argument. | 'However, long-term savings outweigh initial costs.' |
| Conclusion signal words | Therefore, thus, hence, consequently, so, it follows that, this shows, this means. | 'The results were consistent; therefore, the method is reliable.' |
| The 'So What?' test | Ask: what is the author ultimately trying to convince you of? That is the conclusion. | Strip away all evidence. What single claim is left? That is the conclusion. |
| Conclusions can appear anywhere | They are not always at the end of an argument. | Some passages state the conclusion first and then provide evidence. |
| The assumption is never stated | If it were stated, it would be a premise. Assumptions are implicit. | 'A therefore C' — the assumption is 'A leads to B and B leads to C'. |
| Gap identification | Find the logical gap between the premises and the conclusion. The assumption fills that gap. | Premise: 'Students who exercise score higher.' Conclusion: 'Exercise improves academic performance.' Assumption: 'Higher scores = better performance; exercise caused the scores, not vice versa.' |
| Negation test | If you negate the assumption and the argument falls apart, it was the assumption. | Negate: 'Exercise does NOT improve academic performance.' If the argument is now invalid, this was the key assumption. |
CAT vs GRE — Key Differences▾
Paragraph mapping
Predict before options
Critical reasoning skills
Inference techniques
GRE vocabulary
Precision reading
Synonym recognition
GRE: no penalty → ALWAYS answer every question
Both CAT and GRE test verbal reasoning, but they do so differently. Understanding the differences helps CAT students transfer their skills effectively and avoid applying CAT strategies where GRE requires a different approach.
| Text Completion | GRE only. One to three blanks per sentence. No equivalent in CAT verbal. | The GRE's most distinctive verbal question type. |
| Sentence Equivalence | GRE only. Six options, choose two synonyms. No CAT equivalent. | Requires synonym identification — not tested in CAT. |
| Reading Comprehension | Both. GRE passages are shorter (100-450 words). CAT passages are longer (600-900 words). | GRE RC requires more precise reading of individual sentences. |
| Para-jumbles | CAT only. GRE does not test paragraph ordering. | A major CAT question type with no GRE equivalent. |
| Sentence Correction | CAT only (grammar-focused). GRE does not explicitly test grammar. | GRE tests vocabulary and logic, not grammar rules. |
| Critical Reasoning | Both. GRE tests it through RC (strengthen/weaken). CAT tests it more explicitly. | Identical technique: identify conclusion, assumption, and gap. |
| GRE vocabulary | High and specific. GRE tests a defined set of academic vocabulary (Latin/Greek roots). | Knowing the 500 most common GRE words significantly boosts your score. |
| CAT vocabulary | Moderate. CAT tests vocabulary in context more than isolated word knowledge. | CAT relies more on contextual inference; GRE requires explicit word knowledge. |
| Transfer | CAT vocabulary work transfers to GRE but is insufficient alone. | GRE requires additional dedicated vocabulary study. |
| GRE passages | 100-450 words. Precision matters more than speed. | Every sentence in a short GRE passage is meaningful. |
| CAT passages | 600-900 words. Speed and skimming matter more. | CAT rewards efficient reading of long passages. |
| Strategy transfer | Paragraph mapping and active reading transfer to GRE. | CAT skimming habits can hurt on GRE — GRE passages are too short to skim. |
| GRE scoring | No negative marking. Always guess — never leave blank. | Unanswered = 0. Guessed and wrong = 0. Guessed and right = +1. |
| CAT scoring | Negative marking: -1 for wrong answer. Strategic skipping is valid. | CAT strategy: skip if less than ~30% confident. GRE strategy: always guess. |
| The critical difference | CAT rewards strategic skipping; GRE rewards aggressive guessing. | Never apply CAT's skipping strategy to GRE. |